Al Jahom’s Final Word

November 8, 2009

More bubblewrap, Vicar?

Oh very dear…

image

Yesm tgar;d ve.

I do apologise. I appear to have head-butted my keyboard. I’d rather see government health warnings on brain melting bullshit like this.

And in case you were thinking this is just some random wingnut who won’t get a serious hearing…

Dr Pfeffer, who is also an international mentor for the World Health Organisation, will address the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents this week and call for children’s television programmes, particularly live action programmes, to carry ratings for parents to make informed choices for their children.

Among the programmes she deemed to contain the most risky behaviour were Scooby-Doo, Batman, X-Men and Ben 10.

image

AJ

UPDATE: Read all about the woolly headed muppet behind this shit here.

Buying votes…

I spotted this little story in the Mail on Sunday.

Labour has been accused of relying on the ‘welfare vote’ after the Conservatives published a provocative league table ranking Commons seats according to the number of benefit claimants.

A total of 189 constituencies in the first 200 are represented by Labour MPs, which the Tories claim explains why Ministers are failing to tackle the spiralling welfare bill.

I could have a good old rant about this, and the fact that the top five scroungers constituencies are über-entitled Scouse cunts, porridge wogs and mono-browed morlocks. Look:

image

Happily, however, Old Holborn has covered matters off nicely here:

One third of the seats in Parliament are represented by dole scounging, benefit sucking fucking wastrels, high on tax payers money and living the fucking life of Riley at the expense of everyone else.

There it is. Labour’s "client" state. Wonder why the streets are full of Stella swilling, Argos blinged mongtards without a care in the world? Labour WANTS it that way. Wondered why most of London speaks Somali and dresses in fucking tents? Labour wants it that way. Wondered why gun crime and violence in the UK makes us the most dangerous fucking place in Europe? Labour wants it that way.

You traitorous bastards. You have used our stolen money to fuck us. A country ruined so that YOU could have the power to bribe yourselves to yet more power.

In an adjacent post, OH also highlight’s a wonderful tale of pecksniff state drones, thinkofthechildrenism and thought crimes. Unbefeckinlievable.

AJ

October 28, 2009

Conference Call Ennui…

Filed under: Larf, Thicko Culture, Thinkofthechildrenism, Uncommon Sense — Al Jahom @ 2:26 pm

Yesterday:

image

Today:

image

AJ

October 27, 2009

Children…

Filed under: Larf, Thinkofthechildrenism — Al Jahom @ 6:08 pm

I don’t have any, so don’t fucking lecture me about my carbon arseprint, you total cunts.

I’ll hand you over to my friends Doug, George and Bill:

And more Bill…

Fin.

AJ

Surrounded by total peasants…

Filed under: Thinkofthechildrenism, WTF? — Al Jahom @ 1:21 pm

On a train again. In the ‘quite carriage’. It’s evidently half-term because the fucking thing is awash with grey-faced hausfraus, with their noisy selfish scum-encrusted offspring.

Said grey-faces wonder why I scowl at them when they board my carriage with their screaming kids, where I’m sat with my laptop, doing business documentation.

Of course, I have no entitlement to any peace in order to work. Not when compared to the rights of this fucking cunt and her hideous whining offspring. The whole carriage is theirs, to pollute with noise, running around and generally being a fucking pain in the balls.

And I’m in the wrong, and clearly in the way, when one of these horrible children boots me in the knee while cavorting about.

Fucking inconsiderate cunts. Die. And the fucking bitch wondered why I spent the next 20 minutes giving her death-stares, until she dragged her little fucks to another carriage.

I could only focus on the inconsiderate cunts nearest to me, but there were 4 different groups, in the quiet carriage alone, all of whom deserve to see their children put through a rusty bacon slicer.

Peasant scum.

AJ

October 21, 2009

Torn…

Filed under: Scotland, Social Workers, Thinkofthechildrenism — Al Jahom @ 3:44 pm

I can’t make my mind up about this one…

image

Social workers have moved to take into care a baby born to an obese mother.

The mother — who cannot be named in order to protect the identity of the children — gave birth by Caesarean section last week in a Dundee hospital but was told within 24 hours that she would not be allowed to keep the baby.

She has already had the youngest of her six children, aged 3 and 4, removed from her care because social workers feared that they were at risk of becoming obese. The 40-year-old mother weighed 23 stone before falling pregnant.

The parents originally contacted social workers themselves to seek help with managing their children, one of whom has developmental problems.

So one the one side, we have an inexcusably fat woman, who hasn’t taken personal responsibility for her wellbeing. So what? Whose business is that but hers? If she dies, she dies. Her husband would have to take on the kids.

And who the fucking hell to social services think they are?

Ready for the twist?

At that time they had a toddler who weighed 4 stone and a 13-year-old boy who weighed more than 16 stone.

Ah… so actually, it is child abuse.

So in one corner we have a humongous biffer who is severely endangering the health of her children. One must, for that matter, assume the husband to be complicit too.

In the other corner, we have the self-righteous social workers, eager to stick their oar in, break up a family and thrust several children into a care system that has notoriously disastrous outcomes as the norm.

Were the parents offered a deal regarding weight and diet? Is there a hereditary genetic explanation for the weight of these people? Have they been given help, support, advice and medical attention? The answer appears to be a qualified ‘yes’:

The married couple, who cannot be named for legal reasons, were warned last year that that they had to bring their six children’s weight under control.

But the parents do apparently care in some what or another…

Speaking to The Times today the father of the baby, aged 54, said that the whole family was “heartbroken” at the loss of their baby.

And every cloud has a silver lining:

“I can’t sleep, I can’t eat. I can’t tell you how powerless I feel. The other children are devastated too,” he said.

Collectively, the family has lost 12 stone in the last week and the local kebab van has relocated to Dumfries.

Anyway, back to the socialist workers, for some smelliness:

The father said social workers had assured him last week that they would not go near the hospital and that he believed an interim report by Dundee Families Project recommending intensive support for the whole family was to be acted upon. He said he was “shocked and traumatised” that social workers had come into the labour ward and attempted to serve papers on his wife.

A hearing tomorrow will discuss a social work application to remove the families’ remaining three children.

The family has already made two legal attempts to have the two children already taken from them returned and they were due to make a third appeal against the decision today.

ANd here come some weasel words from the council:

A Dundee City Council spokesman said: “Local authorities who are involved in the welfare of children have a legal duty to ensure they are protected from publicity that may have a serious effect on them and the council takes seriously this responsibility.

Now to imply that there’s something more sinister afoot:

“We have made it clear on numerous occasions that children would not be removed from a family environment just because of a weight issue.”

Hmmm….

AJ

October 18, 2009

Obnostrodamus: Got any tips for the Gee Gees, Obo?

Filed under: Nostradamus Lives, Thinkofthechildrenism — Al Jahom @ 12:25 pm

Remarkable…

image

And today…

image

‘t’ain’t nothin’ but a ROFL thing…

AJ

September 26, 2009

Fuck the NSPCC…

Filed under: Commie Bastards, Thinkofthechildrenism — Al Jahom @ 3:07 pm

In a developing theme,

image

http://dickpuddlecote.blogspot.com/search?q=nspcc

http://heresycorner.blogspot.com/2009/09/nspcc-in-spin-about-isa.html

http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2009/1/29/the-nspcc-a-danger-to-society.html

Perhaps the only surprising thing in the ad is that it says ‘mummy’ rather than ‘daddy’. Surely a mother couldn’t ever hurt her child, now?

I can’t decide whether we should ban mothers or children. Although that decision always seems clear enough when I’m on an aircraft.

AJ

In other piss-boilers

Ambush Predator: Coppers wildly overstep their remit once again…

Today’s ‘WTF?!?’ Story…

South Yorkshire Police apparently have enough time on their hands to wander the streets, peeking in car windows and, if there are any items on display, doing this:

If any items are on show, the officer will record it, along with the car registration number, to help identify the car owner. Using the DVLA’s MOT database, they will then be able to find out who are the car’s insurers.
The forms will then be sent out to insurance companies – which will either lead to people’s premiums rocketing or their policies being cancelled.

I’m speechless…

Letters from a Tory: Again, we must account for ourselves before the state, or we are non-persons liable to sanction…

Vetting scheme for adults gets even worse

From the Telegraph:

Adults who look after friends’ children on a regular basis are being forced to register with Ofsted under new legislation.  They must complete a criminal record check, learn first aid, take a childcare course and even follow Labour’s “nappy curriculum” for under-fives. …It comes just weeks after it emerged that parents giving lifts to other children face prosecution if they fail to register with the Government’s vetting and barring scheme, a new anti-paedophile database.  Dr Richard House, senior lecturer in psychotherapy at Roehampton University, and founder of the Open EYE campaign group, said: “In any ‘couldn’t-make-it-up’ league table, this latest Government incursion into family life surely has to come very near the top.  It beggars belief that Ofsted is now telling parents that a private co-operative arrangement whereby friends choose to take care of each others’ children is against the law. It appears that the stealthy nationalisation of childcare is now proceeding at full throttle.”

Read On…

More on that from the Faily Dail:

Mothers are banned from looking after each other’s children

Two working mothers have been banned from looking after each other’s toddlers because they are not registered childminders.

The close friends’ private arrangement had let them both return to part-time jobs at the same company.

However, a whistleblower reported them to the education watchdog Ofsted and it found their informal deal broke the law.

This was because little-known rules say friends cannot gain a ‘reward’ by looking after a child for more than two hours outside the child’s home without agreeing to a number of checks including one from the Criminal Records Bureau.

Although the mothers never paid each other, their job-sharing deal was judged to be a ‘reward’. Campaigners fear thousands of working families could be innocently breaking the rules by relying on close friends for informal childcare.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1216220/Mothers-banned-looking-children.html#ixzz0SDkJz8Qm

Boatang & Demetriou: Police say “anti-social behaviour’s not our problem”…

Crime and the ever-extending tentacles of the state

According to the Telegraph, a senior cop has popped up at the Inquest of the deaths of Fiona Pilkington and Francecca Hardwick (a mother and daughter who tragically killed themselves following a campaign of terror by scum bags) and said that anti-social behaviour has nothing to do with the police.

At the inquest into the pair’s deaths yesterday, Superintendent Steve Harrod, head of criminal justice at Leicestershire Police, acknowledged that the criminal justice system was set up to avoid sending juveniles to prison.
He said police officers were only allowed to issue warnings to young troublemakers unless their behaviour was judged to be serious.

"I’m not sure if people know but low-level anti-social behaviour is mainly the responsibility of the council"

Well, don’t shoot the messenger. What he is saying is disgusting, but it’s not particularly his fault and he is right. Because indeed, the terrorism of society and the low level crime that blights estates and communities up and down the country is no longer in the domain of the judiciary.

Because the state, along with everything else near it’s grasp, has snapped up and entwined the issue of juvenile delinquency and anti social crime and terror within its clammy tentacles.

Read On..

Rantin Rab: Scottish Airport Police demand to see passports of English domestic travellers.

It appears that Strathclyde’s finest have decided to, or have been told to, check the passports of passengers arriving at Prestwick Airport.

Passengers on domestic flights, that is.

Just what business it is of the police to be checking passports is anyone’s guess. Checking the passports of international passengers is the job of the UKBA.

So why are they checking passports and what happens to those who refuse to play their stupid game? It’s not an offence to travel without a valid passport on a domestic flight.

In my opinion they powers that be are just testing our ‘compliance threshold’. If the sheeple happily play along with this, what’s next?

More on this in the Times:

English travellers to Scotland ‘need’ passports

English passengers making internal flights to Scottish airports are being asked to show their passports when they land, police have confirmed.

Officers are carrying out routine identity checks on domestic flights under terrorism legislation. This can mean forcing passengers to show passports or other photographic identification.

Those arriving on international flights are required to go through passport control, but domestic passengers are usually checked for photographic ID before boarding their plane.

The checks came to light after shadow home secretary Chris Grayling was asked to produce his documents when he arrived at Glasgow Prestwick airport on an internal flight.

The Terrorism Act 2000 gives police forces the power to stop anyone for identification checks, which can include showing a passport. Strathclyde Police, which covers Prestwick, 30 miles south west of the city centre, said its officers use the legislation “proportionately”.

A force spokesman said: “’Police officers, similar to other Border and Law Enforcement Agencies, operate at UK Air and Sea Ports in furtherance of their role of protecting our communities.

"As part of their duties, police require to establish the identity of persons present at or transiting through a port and, in recognition of this, legislation is provided for that purpose.

Well then.. the next time my firm want me to travel north of the border, I’m going to tell them to go fuck themselves.

Time to go shoot golf balls at the cat.

I fucking hate what these cunts have done to my country, my life, my liberty and my sanity.

AJ

September 22, 2009

All hail natural selection…

Filed under: Larf, Thinkofthechildrenism, Uncommon Sense — Al Jahom @ 12:49 am

It’s like organic eugenics…

http://www.parentdish.com/2009/08/07/kids-would-stay-in-burning-buildings-survey-shows

image

Wait… what??

News just in. Some commie fuck-knuckle has a great idea.

image

Ah yeah – it’s a good question to ask. How did I get to the sweet old age of 45*, without this wisdom?

The man with the answer was referred to previously

Think on, or fuck off…

AJ

* Claimed age may vary according to rhetorical demands. I’ll always be seven, with lego.

September 15, 2009

Recycling…

If it’s good enough for them:

Dads ‘to share maternity leave’

Fathers will be able to take six months’ paternity leave, the government has announced.

The move will allow mothers to decide to return to work after six months and fathers to stay at home for the rest of the 12 months off allowed by law.

It’s good enough for me:

March 29, 2009

Thanks a fucking bunch says everyone…

They’re bound to go for this. This government’s eye for a lose-lose-lose strategy is just uncanny. You have to laugh.

Cut in maternity leave to give fathers more time off

Statutory maternity leave should be cut to six months and new paid leave given to fathers, a report from the equalities watchdog says.

The focus on maternity leave has entrenched the notion that only mothers look after children and damages women’s careers by making them less attractive employees, the group warns.

I can immediately spot three groups who could lose out from this:

i) Women who have given birth. Do they want to go back to work ‘so soon’?

ii) New fathers who would rather be paid to polish the toilet floors in the Blue Oyster Bar than to spend any more time with their miraculous new shitting air-raid sirens.

iii) The productive members of the economy. The trouble with post-natal women, and I speak from a position of complete ignorance, is that they’re either completely mental or utterly baffled. With most it’s quite clear that their brains take a while to return to proper functioning order. Others will never recover. About a year is probably right to know for sure. So what’s the point in having them back in the business sooner than that, with all the post-natal prolapsed rectum treatments they’ll be excusing themselves for? In the meantime, productive men will be taken out of the economy for longer.

I just can’t see how these proposals can benefit anyone – certainly not an economy under such pressure as this.

Nothing has changed, has it… this is still bullshit. And if you disagree, look at it from my point of view.

Paternity Leave…

Man up or fuck off out of my company, you pussy-whipped, whining little motherfuckers.

I hope your cabbage grows an extra head that looks like Harriet Harman, you cunt.

And don’t think I’ll pick up the fucking slack.

And as far as I’m concerned, if I ever have to work with you again, then for every time you show me a picture of your kids, I’ll show you one of my cats.

Every time you leave early or arrive late because of your kids, I’ll remember I have to take my cats to school, the dentist, playgroup, pole-dancing etc.

And when you swap your M3 for a Megane Scenic, I’ll laugh heartily. In your face, you blamanche brained cunt.

AJ

September 12, 2009

This cheered me up though…

Filed under: Larf, Motoring, Thinkofthechildrenism — Al Jahom @ 3:08 pm

 CaPTVR

AJ

September 11, 2009

More Child Protection Ludicrousness…

What do you get when you cross tatty socialist dogma, incompetence, political correctness and bureaucratic detachment?

That’s right. Haringey Council Child Protection Services.

Via OH, some shit that genuinely beggars belief… and one to get the knuckle-scraping BNP voters out in force.

Haringey. Yet. Again

"Muslim children can only be placed with people of the same faith and the need to find foster parents could mean that corners were cut in the vetting process."

Erm…The council at the centre of the Baby P scandal sent a foster child to live with the ringleader of the airline bomb plotters, the Standard can reveal.

Read on…

Why don’t they just accept that they can do no right and fuck all the way off? That Shoesmith cunt should peeled and rolled in salt for the consequences her time running that show and the legacy she’s left behind. And to this day, that fucking bitch thinks she’s the victim in all that’s happened.

It’s about time someone got busy on her with an angle-grinder and a rasp.

AJ

UPDATE: On second inspection, and to change the subject slightly, The Standard’s story contains something very smelly indeed.

Ali’s wife has also been charged under anti-terror laws for allegedly failing to inform authorities of the plot. However, she strongly asserts her innocence.

I’ll watch with interest. I don’t know how the fuck they’ll make that stick. Irrespective of what her husband has done, I’ll give this woman the benefit of the doubt until I know more.

Anyway, I thought one couldn’t be compelled to incriminate one’s spouse in English law?

The balance between citizen and state…

Filed under: Guilty until proven Innocent, Thinkofthechildrenism, WTF? — Al Jahom @ 2:03 pm

Trixy has neatly summed up the appropriate response to a headline I was unfortunate enough to alight upon in the local fat-cunt-waster-central supermarket yesterday.

The following neatly demonstrates why Radio 4 no longer ever darkens my radio, even if John Humphreys comes out it reasonably well. This is, after all, a relative measure, and you need to ask yourself you serious fucking questions if you’re not looking favourable next to a Labour politician.

‘Just answer the question you f**king fascist’

Were the first words which came out of my mouth this morning. Yes, there were of course the early morning mutterings as I padded around trying to remember how to use my arms, but this was sniper fire in Anglo Saxon vernacular. I spat those words out.

And I’m sure many other people did too when listening to the stream of detritus emerging from the mouth of Children’s Minister Delyth Morgan.

How shall I sum up the latest piece of draconian legislation from this government? Okay.

If you’re an adult then you’re a paedophile until the state says you aren’t.

And I don’t think I’m exaggerating with this one because John Humphries seemed to come to exactly the same conclusion as me and I’ve often thought he’s a bit of a softie. But the woman, of course, could not answer a simple question. It was like Paxman and Howard with her refusal to answer an example on this proposal from her department.
Yes or No. That’s all it would have taken. Would someone who took some kids to swimming lessons on a regular basis at the request of the parents of the kids be required to undergo an anti kiddy fiddler check.

And she refused to answer time and time again, realising I’m sure that the answer was indefensible no matter how many high profile cases have occurred over the last few years.

Do read on – it’s great work.

AJ

Total news blackout…

The other day, I was warming to the idea of the coming winter bringing with it political turmoil and schadenfreuderous giggles.

Today, however, while perusing Mr Puddlecote’s splendid blog, I wondered if I really do want to dive back into all that fucking shit.

You And Your Family Will Die Horribly – Soon
Another Day, Another Witless Attack On Alcohol
Be On Your Way, This Is Our Territory
Onward Puritan Soldiers

Now, while DP writes very well and provides thoughtful and informed comment, there’s no getting away from the message of relentless and depressing attacks on our liberty and adulthood that we are sustaining on a daily basis at the hands of these socialist, ideologue, control-freak fuckheads who run the show.

I’ve not seen TV news now for months. I’ve not picked up a newspaper or gone beyond the front page of a news website for months.

And it has been absolutely fucking joyous.

It seems impossible to remain happy while keeping abreast of the latest ways in which the bullying, thieving state intends to encroach upon our autonomy and humanity, while pissing all of our money up the cunting wall.

So I’m going to have to find something else to write about this winter. Certainly, as you’ll have already seen, my bile will be focussed away from flogging the dead horse that’s in power now and towards Davy Spameron, who is, without a shadow of a doubt, going to usher in at least 5 more years of the same fucking shit.

Fuck the lot of them. Fuck Labour. Fuck the Tories. Fuck News International. Fuck the Daily Mail. Fuck the unions. Fuck the health & safety executive. Fuck lawyers. Fuck local councils. Fuck teachers. Fuck Trevor Phillips. Motherfuck the BBC.

And breathe…

AJ

September 9, 2009

Fuck off…

Filed under: Motoring, Thinkofthechildrenism, Tough Shit Syndrome — Al Jahom @ 8:19 pm

Just back from another 475 mile round trip to see one of my lovely customers. Another 7 hours in the car, another dozen polarguins on the barbecue.

Another 2 fucking hours in cunting roadworks.

So I’d like to say something insightful about this post from DK. But I can’t be fucking bothered.

Suffice it to say, I agree with Steve Shark, who’s link sent me to DK’s article. That is not to tip the hat as such, now Steve is a member of a cock-munching clique (I wonder if he knows what the initiation ritual involves. A re-enactment of the image Obo linked to here is an understatement.)

Fuck the north.

AJ

July 13, 2009

Holy mother of god…

Filed under: Larf, Thinkofthechildrenism — Al Jahom @ 8:34 pm

I think I just ripped my diaphragm laughing….. at GOT

image

AJ

June 16, 2009

In Loco Idiotus

 
The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’  Ronald Reagan

From Ambush Predator, another reminder of what happens when they decide to play mummy & daddy…

Man’s Social Service’s Inhumanity To Man…

A dying woman whose children are in foster care has been told that her contact with them will be cut to 90 minutes a fortnight because of her failing health.

Doesn’t that give you a warm feeling inside? It does me.

Of rage, mind you…

Her son and daughter were taken into care because of an allegation — dismissed after an investigation — that a friend had sexually abused one of them.

So why are they still in care?

Mrs Brown’s large and supportive family have made numerous attempts to bring the children back into their care.

Her father, George, 72, a former BBC executive, was judged too old to look after the children, although he has regularly taken them on holidays. Anne offered to buy a bigger house to accommodate them, but was told that her job as a journalist would make it impossible for her to parent them.

Mrs Brown’s son Sam, who is 23, was assessed as not having a sufficiently stable relationship with his girlfriend.

Oh, where to start..?

It seems that having taken the children, they are now pulling excuses out of their collective arse in order to hang onto them. Too old at 72? Journalism not an ‘approved’ job?

And not having a ‘sufficiently stable’ relationship? Are you kidding me? Since when have the SS worried about that?

Pretty nearly all their recent screw-ups have involved the kind of ‘families’ where an attempt to chart the relationships would look like a drunken spider had gotten into someone’s Etch-A-Sketch…

Then in March 2006 Mrs Brown arrived at the children’s school to find that they had been taken into care. Louise had told her teacher that a friend of her mother had abused her.
Mrs Brown recalled packing her children’s clothes as they waited outside in the social worker’s car. They left that afternoon.

After a police investigation and medical examination, the allegation was dismissed.

Louise retracted her statement to the family. But social services became concerned about Mrs Brown’s ability to protect her children.

“The social workers say they have got new families. But we are their family,” Anne said. “When they’re 16 social services won’t want to know them.”

Quite. They’ll be turned out onto the street, along with all the other young people irrevocably damaged by being condemned to the ‘care’ of the State.

Which, as always, isn’t exactly bucking the trend in this case:

On the brink of adolescence, the children are not likely candidates for adoption and the family says their behaviour has deteriorated significantly. Both hover on the edge of exclusion from school. Their family concedes that they are now difficult to handle together.

Their grandfather believes that this is because of the disruptions: “They have been knocked off a normal way of life with their mother and among family and they have been isolated and pitched into an alien atmosphere.”

Which is not to say that such deterioration is inevitable. But it’d take a very, very strong character to survive such upheaval and uncertainty.

In 2007 a judge emphasised the importance of retaining the children’s strong family bonds. Anne believes that depriving a dying woman of her children goes against this direction. As her relatives spoke, Mrs Brown faintly echoed their feelings. “Angry,” she muttered. “Angry and sad.”

There’s nothing more to add, really, is there?

Not really, no.

AJ

June 14, 2009

The breeding disease…

Filed under: Larf, Thinkofthechildrenism — Al Jahom @ 6:02 pm

This made me chuckle…

image

Almost certainly more dangerous than swine flu, I’ll wager…

AJ

May 17, 2009

On a related note….

Filed under: Larf, Thieving Bastards, Thinkofthechildrenism — Al Jahom @ 11:16 pm

I also came up with this one for the miracle breeders such as the one below.

image

AJ

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.