Racist!

This is LOLsome and disturbing in equal measures…

The MEP told a jury that Tauriq Khalid, of Burnley, Lancs, called him a “white ——-“ and pointed his fingers at him like a gun during a BNP demonstration in the town last year.

He said that he viewed the gesture as a “direct threat” to his safety which forced him to abandon the demonstration on the advice of his private security guards.

Mr Khalid was traced and arrested after one of the BNP members noted down his car registration and complained to the police, Preston Crown Court heard.

This is quite troubling really, because one can’t ignore how much of an utter Scunthorpe Nick Griffin is.

However, what’s good for the goose is good for the gander. I loathe the way the race card is brandished as a magic shield by minorities.

Griffin is turning the weapons of political correctness back on all those who would normally wield them.

It’s long overdue and, sadly, it is a poignant illustration of the fact that the battles many of us would like to see fought are only being addressed by Griffin and his goons.

Will people realise that Griffin’s activities are a shrewd cover for a sinister agenda, or will they come round to the view that only the BNP are prepared to speak for the white working class? I predict that they’ll win a seat in Westminster at the next election. Perhaps Burnley, Oldham, Rochdale, Bradford, Leeds or Hull.

It’s a bleak prospect, but I think it’s just the shock our political caste need.

AJ

No harm, no foul?

Okay… my title seems out of place with the Times’ headline, but bear with me…

Teenage girls wanting to join violent male gangs are being forced into having sex and ferrying guns, knives and drugs, police and charities have found.

The girls, some as young as 13, want to join gangs to raise their own profile or to seek protection. Often they are swayed by the status given to the senior members of the gang.

When they first join they are told they must have sex with one member of the gang — and then find several of the gang waiting for them.

Now, this is all more than a little seedy, and does sniff of rape… but not to the girls involved, apparently.

What has shocked welfare workers is that the girls accept the situation as normal and do not appreciate that they are being violated.

Errr.. okay.. so.. as young as 13 you say?

In a recent raid by police targeting violent youth crime, 25 females aged between 14 and 39 were arrested in connection with assaults, drug offences and carrying weapons.

Oh.. maybe not then.

Superintendent David Chinchen, who deals with youth violence, said: “Young women are being dragged into the fringes of male criminality and gangs. We are seeing more elements of violence from girls within gangs.” He also said that officers had seen signs of girls becoming involved in sexual violence.

So these same girls who are ‘being violated’, though not, apparently, against their will are also colluding in sexual violence. They don’t sound like victims to me.

Let’s face it, the papers are awash with stories of girls aged 11 and up getting pregnant, pissed, shagging strangers, whatever.

So it’s not clear if the above rape assertion is based on statutory rape, or something more like:

Social Worker: So you had sex with all these boys?

Yolanda: Yeah.. whatever.

SW: But you’re 14 years old.

Yolanda: Whatever. Me dad left when I was a baby. Mum’s been an alcoholic for the last ten years and I’ve been raising my little brother all that time. 14 ain’t a time for playing with dollies in my world Mrs Doogooder.

SW: You were gang raped.

Yolanda: Yo, I got those boys eating out of my hand now. I don’t get no trouble on the street. They didn’t hurt me. No more than my mum does anyway. Or my P.E. teacher. Or the priest.

SW: But… [Ticks ‘RAPE’ box, 5 times.]

Hmm.. Harriet should be pleased.

AJ

Bitch fight!

Via Ambush Predator and needing nothing in the way of commentary…

Violent crime committed by women has soared since Labour came to power, it is revealed today.

The number of women found guilty of murder, vicious assault and other attacks has risen by 81 per cent since 1998.

The massive increase, revealed in the Government’s own data, means that women are now being convicted at the rate of more than 200 every week.

Murders have more than doubled, life-threatening woundings are up by a fifth and common assault has soared by 151 per cent.

…

Women are fast becoming as likely as men to be caught up in alcohol-fuelled violence in bars and town centres.

Dr David Green, director of the Civitas think-tank, said: ‘The idea of a violent woman really was something of an oddity 15 or 20 years ago.

‘But there has been a trend among a distinct minority of young females to become more like men, and the role models they have chosen to emulate are the worst men, rather than the best.

‘Add to that the drinking, and that adds up to more violence.’

The figures come just days after five women were caught on CCTV kicking and stamping on Matthew Campbell, 38, in a random attack.

One of the women was shown stepping forward and kicking him full in the face.

Then, as he cowered on the floor, he was subjected to a barrage of blows and kicks from the gang.

All the attackers, aged between 21 and 42, are members of the same extended family and had been drinking heavily.

In a separate incident, two 17-year-old girls were arrested after a 62-year-old gay man was beaten to death in Trafalgar Square.

Some 12,573 women were convicted for violence in 2007 – the year covered by the latest figures – compared to 6,937 in 1998. Common assaults were up from 3,209 to 8,068.

…

Violence is now the most common reason for women being arrested in England and Wales, overtaking theft and handling stolen goods.

Well done Jack, Harriet, Tony, Charles, Jacqui. Pat on the back, ‘y’all.

Not.

AJ

Non-Direct Violent Action…

Not that I have sympathy for plod, but they’re above lefties in the order of preference, even if they’re below Ebola.

AJ

Brucey says “Lighten up, bitches” in plea for Black & White Minstrel revival…

As he’s 81 years old (“gawd bless ‘im”), he’s exempt from racism charges. On the Juliette scale at least.

Whatever. He’ll be dead soon. Cunt.

AJ

How strange…

Spotted at a railway station.

 “Come on show me your cocoa beam”

Regular readers will know that I’m not one for political correctness, but I was utterly amazed when I saw this. My lovely companion, who knows a thing or two about advertising, was similarly taken aback.

Scouring the intermong, I was amazed not to find hoards of professionally aggrieved numpties screaming racism.

Oh well… I’m sure it’s just a matter of time. Here’s the TV advert associated with the same campaign.

AJ

Racism…

Even though I’m a lover of stereotypes, I know and accept all the arguments against racism on an intellectual level, as well as a social and professional level. Which is to say that in my dealings with the world, I’m colour blind.

So how is it, then, that I’d have put a grand on the fact that these animals are black?

And I’d have won my bet.

Utterly sickening and savage. Honestly, if that happened to you, or your wife, wouldn’t you decide that the metropolis was no longer for you?

And how does one scrutinise the undisputed fact that, in London, black men commit crime way out of proportion with their percentage of the population, without getting strung up for being a nigga-hata?

Some attempts here:

http://www.thelondondailynews.com/hypocrisy-surrounding-black-crime-london-p-687.html

http://mksviews.wordpress.com/2008/07/21/mostly-black-youth-responsible-for-knife-crime-in-london/

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/the-truth-about-black-on-black-crime-444774.html

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/edwest/10062027/Rod_Liddle_bravely_tells_the_truth_about_knife_crime/

Much will be made of the experience that this poor woman endured. And though not to trivialise her ordeal, I suspect that little thought will be given to her bloke and what’s going through his mind. Apart from the sheer humiliation, what’s he thinking now? Does he still ‘want her’ now she’s been violated in this way? That’s a rational thought, but the guilt he’ll feel from that thought will be as overwhelming as that from being unable to protect the mother of his child, in his own home.

Sadly, and I doubt I’ll ever know the outcome but, I don’t think this couple will be together a year from now. This couple are both badly damaged now and it’ll be a long time before either of them comes close to being fixed, and that is a howling tragedy for them and their child.

In a way, I’d hope the assailants aren’t caught (by the law at least), because the inevitably paltry sentences, meaning they’ll be out and grinning while the victims are still emotional and psychological wrecks will be the ultimate slap in the face.

But I suppose I probably wouldn’t care, because I’d be in Broadmoor after an extraordinary string of violent and gruesome racist murders with a chainsaw, a machete, a mile of piano wire and a pair of bricks.

And Brown’s leading into the next election on a law and order ticket?

YOU DID THIS, BROWN

YOU DID THIS, BLAIR

YOU DID THIS, TREVOR PHILLIPS

YOU DID THIS, SIR WILLIAM MACPHERSON

YOU DID THIS, DAMILOLA TAYLOR’S STEPHEN LAWRENCE’S MOTHER

YOU DID THIS, POLLY TOYNBEE.

YOU DID THIS, SHARMI CHAKRABATI

YOU DID THIS, JACK STRAW

YOU DID THIS, HARRIET HARMAN

YOU DID THIS, DAVID BLUNKETT

YOU DID THIS, JACQUI SMITH

YOU DID THIS, BARONESS SCOTLAND

I HOPE YOU ALL GET YOUR LITERAL AND METAPHORICAL BACK DOORS KICKED IN BY SOME RAMPAGING BUNCH OF SAVAGES, YOU UNUTTERABLE CUNTS.

Finally, let me put a rhetorical question to you. If the Metropolitan Police are institutionally racist, why is it they’re completely unable to get on top of black crime? I mean, random unsanctioned dawn raids, falling down stairs, claiming he had a gun, then shooting him (think LA Confidential), falsified statements, witness intimidation and evidence suppression, anybody? If the police felt at liberty to act precisely as they wished regarding ethnics, surely they’d have an unbeatable advantage.

AJ

UPDATE: Actually, where I said Damilola Taylors mother, I actually meant Stephen Lawrence’s mother. Sorry.

UPDATE 2: I forgot Ken Livingstone, Lee Jasper and Sir Ian Blair. Cunts.

Is this guy not fucking dead yet?

Racism is driving anti-Obama protests, says Carter

“I think that an overwhelming proportion of the intensely-demonstrated animosity toward President Barack Obama is based on the fact that he is a black man, he’s African-American,” Mr Carter told NBC television, in a potentially explosive intervention in national politics.

Really? Because I think that the intensely-demonstrated animosity towards President Fuzzy Barry is based on the fact that he’s a looting communist windbag who’s setting the USA on a path that Blair set us on in 1997. They’ve seen their future here, and they don’t like it.

The scandalous money pit that is the NHS, the illiberal, intrusive, hectoring legislation, the mind boggling profligacy, the spin, the lies, the vanity, the vapidity, the lack of substance, the devaluing of education in the interests of fairness, the polarisation and aggrevation of racial groups by multiculturalism and imposed diversity. The managerialism, the top-down centralising, the hubris, the bile, the spite, the faux charm, the populism.

I suppose if Jimmy Carter wants to continue to devalue the issue of race, then so be it. It’s so stereotypically leftist as to be laughable.

Jimmy goes on to say:

“There is an inherent feeling among many in this country that an African-American should not be president.”

Let me shine some light on the reality of it for you:

“There is an inherent feeling among many in this country that a looting communist windbag should not be president.”

Now fuck off Carter, you sucker of Stalin’s cock.

AJ

Recycling…

If it’s good enough for them:

Dads ‘to share maternity leave’

Fathers will be able to take six months’ paternity leave, the government has announced.

The move will allow mothers to decide to return to work after six months and fathers to stay at home for the rest of the 12 months off allowed by law.

It’s good enough for me:

March 29, 2009

Thanks a fucking bunch says everyone…

They’re bound to go for this. This government’s eye for a lose-lose-lose strategy is just uncanny. You have to laugh.

Cut in maternity leave to give fathers more time off

Statutory maternity leave should be cut to six months and new paid leave given to fathers, a report from the equalities watchdog says.

The focus on maternity leave has entrenched the notion that only mothers look after children and damages women’s careers by making them less attractive employees, the group warns.

I can immediately spot three groups who could lose out from this:

i) Women who have given birth. Do they want to go back to work ‘so soon’?

ii) New fathers who would rather be paid to polish the toilet floors in the Blue Oyster Bar than to spend any more time with their miraculous new shitting air-raid sirens.

iii) The productive members of the economy. The trouble with post-natal women, and I speak from a position of complete ignorance, is that they’re either completely mental or utterly baffled. With most it’s quite clear that their brains take a while to return to proper functioning order. Others will never recover. About a year is probably right to know for sure. So what’s the point in having them back in the business sooner than that, with all the post-natal prolapsed rectum treatments they’ll be excusing themselves for? In the meantime, productive men will be taken out of the economy for longer.

I just can’t see how these proposals can benefit anyone – certainly not an economy under such pressure as this.

Nothing has changed, has it… this is still bullshit. And if you disagree, look at it from my point of view.

Paternity Leave…

Man up or fuck off out of my company, you pussy-whipped, whining little motherfuckers.

I hope your cabbage grows an extra head that looks like Harriet Harman, you cunt.

And don’t think I’ll pick up the fucking slack.

And as far as I’m concerned, if I ever have to work with you again, then for every time you show me a picture of your kids, I’ll show you one of my cats.

Every time you leave early or arrive late because of your kids, I’ll remember I have to take my cats to school, the dentist, playgroup, pole-dancing etc.

And when you swap your M3 for a Megane Scenic, I’ll laugh heartily. In your face, you blamanche brained cunt.

AJ

American Politician Speaks Sense on Jacko…

Big respect to the guy hollering at the elephant in the room….

He goes on:

Mr King, a Republican Congressman from the State of New York, placed a two minute rant on the website in which he also called the deceased singer a "child molestor" and a "low life".

"Let’s cut out the psychobabble. This guy was a pervert. He was a child molestor, he was paedophile, and to be giving this much coverage to him day in and day out, what does it say about us and our country? It’s so politically correct," he said.

"There is nothing good about this guy. He may have been a good singer, done some dancing, but the bottom line is would you allow your child or grandchild to be in the same room with Michael Jackson. That would be horrifying."

Speaking outside a fire station King said more thought should be given to Americans dying in Afghanistan and people doing difficult jobs like firefighters and teachers.

His comments are likely to inspire a backlash in America where Michael Jackson has been hailed as a hero.

Eh? The only hero in this story is Peter King.

As I said the other day:

Of course, his boy bumming credentials are conveniently glossed over.

Who’d have thought Gary Glitter would ever have cause for righteous indignation????

All hail!

AJ

In Loco Idiotus

 

The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’  Ronald Reagan

From Ambush Predator, another reminder of what happens when they decide to play mummy & daddy…

Man’s Social Service’s Inhumanity To Man…

A dying woman whose children are in foster care has been told that her contact with them will be cut to 90 minutes a fortnight because of her failing health.

Doesn’t that give you a warm feeling inside? It does me.

Of rage, mind you…

Her son and daughter were taken into care because of an allegation — dismissed after an investigation — that a friend had sexually abused one of them.

So why are they still in care?

Mrs Brown’s large and supportive family have made numerous attempts to bring the children back into their care.

Her father, George, 72, a former BBC executive, was judged too old to look after the children, although he has regularly taken them on holidays. Anne offered to buy a bigger house to accommodate them, but was told that her job as a journalist would make it impossible for her to parent them.

Mrs Brown’s son Sam, who is 23, was assessed as not having a sufficiently stable relationship with his girlfriend.

Oh, where to start..?

It seems that having taken the children, they are now pulling excuses out of their collective arse in order to hang onto them. Too old at 72? Journalism not an ‘approved’ job?

And not having a ‘sufficiently stable’ relationship? Are you kidding me? Since when have the SS worried about that?

Pretty nearly all their recent screw-ups have involved the kind of ‘families’ where an attempt to chart the relationships would look like a drunken spider had gotten into someone’s Etch-A-Sketch…

Then in March 2006 Mrs Brown arrived at the children’s school to find that they had been taken into care. Louise had told her teacher that a friend of her mother had abused her.
Mrs Brown recalled packing her children’s clothes as they waited outside in the social worker’s car. They left that afternoon.

After a police investigation and medical examination, the allegation was dismissed.

Louise retracted her statement to the family. But social services became concerned about Mrs Brown’s ability to protect her children.

“The social workers say they have got new families. But we are their family,” Anne said. “When they’re 16 social services won’t want to know them.”

Quite. They’ll be turned out onto the street, along with all the other young people irrevocably damaged by being condemned to the ‘care’ of the State.

Which, as always, isn’t exactly bucking the trend in this case:

On the brink of adolescence, the children are not likely candidates for adoption and the family says their behaviour has deteriorated significantly. Both hover on the edge of exclusion from school. Their family concedes that they are now difficult to handle together.

Their grandfather believes that this is because of the disruptions: “They have been knocked off a normal way of life with their mother and among family and they have been isolated and pitched into an alien atmosphere.”

Which is not to say that such deterioration is inevitable. But it’d take a very, very strong character to survive such upheaval and uncertainty.

In 2007 a judge emphasised the importance of retaining the children’s strong family bonds. Anne believes that depriving a dying woman of her children goes against this direction. As her relatives spoke, Mrs Brown faintly echoed their feelings. “Angry,” she muttered. “Angry and sad.”

There’s nothing more to add, really, is there?

Not really, no.

AJ

Who is this Paul Henderson cunt?

 

I’m not linking to it, but the erudite destroyer of anti-smoking brimstone, Dick Puddlecote, puts the pillock in his place. Read the whole thing, but be spurred on the by the denouement:

Just my opinion, and all that, but you sir, are a rancid, shallow fucktard who deserves to be fisted up the ringpiece with a sandpaper and broken glass-encrusted glove for using sick kids to justify your selfish and puerile dislikes. Just stick to talking about overpaid men in shorts in future, eh?

Seems fair.

On a related note, I became the proud owner of one of these the other day:

I commend it to thee.

AJ

Scotch Prioritise Crimes against Muslims

As much as I support Scotch independence, it hasn’t happened yet, so they’re still part of the UK.

So it comes as rather more than an average irritation to find that they are devoting police resources to supporting the Muslim community.

Via Atlas Shrugs:

POLICE IN RACE BIAS OUTRAGE

Scottish forces ordered to give priority to crimes against Muslims by Dean Herbert

Police in Scotland have been ordered to give special priority to crimes where the victims are Muslim.

In a move that last night sparked a fresh row over political correctness, a senior officer revealed that the race and religion of a victim has now become a crucial factor in how police respond to crime.

Inspector Tom Galbraith, of Lothian and Borders Police’s diversity unit, told a conference on tackling terrorism that it was important to stop Scottish Muslims feeling “vulnerable” in case they were driven towards radicalism.

Mr. Galbraith said the force encouraged officers to consider the religious or ethnic backgrounds of victims to assess their needs in dealing with hate crimes.

He said that both an attack and a perceived lack of action by police could turn Islamic youths into future terrorists.

Mr. Galbraith also revealed that police officers, Special Branch and BAA security staff were being given special lessons about Islamic culture after Muslims complained that being questioned when entering the country about whether they pray and attend mosques was offensive to their faith.

Speaking at a national security conference in Edinburgh on Thursday, Mr. Galbraith said, “It is not about treating everybody the same.

If I have a young Asian man who has been subjected to a hate crime, I would rather put more resources into that than if it had happened to a white male because the white male is far less likely to end up becoming radicalised.”

He later confirmed that his remarks were in line with Lothian and Borders Police policy, saying that cases of hate crime were assessed “by need”.

He added: “You have to consider cases according to need.  The idea of treating people all the same is a bit naive and we have to remember that there are vulnerable individuals who can be put on the path of radicalism.”

Last night, the police were criticised for being too politically correct in dealing with hate crimes.

Conservative Justice spokesman Bill Aitken said: “I’m afraid we are now living in a society in which some people are more equal than others.

[...]

During the conference, Mr. Galbraith also said that police officers and airport security staff were being given lessons in Islamic culture to avoid offending arrivals.

Which probably means the pigs won’t have the time or inclination to deal with shit like this:

Trio Guilty Of Race Hate Murder

8:16pm UK, Wednesday November 08, 2006

The mother of a teenage boy who was kidnapped, repeatedly stabbed and then burnt alive has spoken of her relief after three men were jailed for the murder.

Kriss Donald’s scarred and partially-clothed body was found on the Clyde Walkway in the east end of Glasgow, inMarch 2004.

Imran Shahid, 29, his brother Zeeshan Shahid, 28, and Mohammed Faisal Mushtaq, 27, were found guilty by a court in Edinburgh.

Just what fucking country are we living in? Appeasing cowardly bastards. Is it any surprise the Islamists think we lily-livered kaffirs deserve their wrath?

This is not about race, or immigration. I’d happily see all the Muslims in the UK replaced with Hindus, Sikhs, Jews, Buddhists, Jedi and Flying Spaghetti Monsterists – but I really would like these medieval, suicide-bombing, women-stoning cunts to get with the programme or get the fuck out of my country. Yes – as a freeborn Englishman, it is my country. This is not a caliphate state.

I shall refer to a rare case of me agreeing with Johann Hairy.

I don’t respect the idea that we should follow a "Prophet" who at the age of 53 had sex with a nine-year old girl, and ordered the murder of whole villages of Jews because they wouldn’t follow him.

Is there an alternative? Well if there really are moderate Muslims out there who object to the way their religion is being supposedly misused and turned into an object of hatred, isn’t about time they fucking piped up and sorted this whole thing out before the BNP get a decent enough grip and Enoch Powell’s vision becomes a reality?

Also mentioned on the same blog is this:

HATE PREACHER GETS OK TO RUN SHARIA LAW DEMO  Daily Star Hat tip Kasper

HATE preacher Anjem Choudary will march in London today calling for Britain to adopt Islamic Sharia law.

The startling move comes just days after processions celebrating St George were banned for being racist.

Choudary was given the green light yesterday despite a previous demonstration in which some of his supporters chanted: “Bomb the UK”.

Publicity for the march, in the East End, carries 41-year-old Choudary’s personal mobile number

Which is apparently 07956 600 569, according to the islam4uk.com site.

and says the aim of the campaign is to “emulate the Prophet and his companions, by calling for Islam and speaking out against the oppression of man-made law”.

It says that Britain is full of “disbelievers” who are involved in prostitution, gambling, alcoholism and worshipping other gods.

The publicity says women are welcome to join the march but they must walk at the back of the procession as “strict segregation will be enforced”.

The demo comes 18 months after three of Choudary’s supporters were jailed for soliciting murder in a London protest against cartoons of the prophet Mohammed published in Denmark.

Just fuck off, you atavistic bastards.

Want another example of us bending over for these fucks? Okay – have this:

U.K.: Thousands of Muslim men using welfare system to support multiple wives

"… the Taxpayers’ Alliance, a lobby group, has complained: ‘Polygamy is not officially condoned here, so why should British taxpayers have to pay for extra benefits for men to have two, three or four wives?’"

For that matter, how many traditional, monogamous couples and their children in Britain are suffering because of the recession while their government hemorrhages money to reward illegal behavior?

"Polygamy UK: This special Mail investigation reveals how thousands of men are milking the benefits system to support several wives," by Sue Reid for the Daily Mail, February 24

AJ

Met Police not not racist anymore…

Met is ‘no longer racist’ – Straw

The Metropolitan Police is no longer institutionally racist, Justice Secretary Jack Straw has said.

His comments came in an interview marking the 10th anniversary of the Macpherson report, published after the murder of teenager Stephen Lawrence.

It heavily criticised the approach and attitude of the force.

Mr Straw told the BBC: "If you are asking me whether I believe the Met as a whole is still institutionally racist, the answer is no."

And it’s true… apart from the bit about them not hating darkies anymore….

Racism ‘alive and vile’ in Metropolitan Police, says Boris Johnson

Racism is “alive and vile” in the Metropolitan Police and must be stamped out without allowing it to threaten the fight against crime, Britain’s most senior officer was warned today.

…

A community support officer has claimed that an “apartheid” culture operated at a London police station where ethnic minority officers were forced to travel separately from white officers.

And of course the professionally aggrieved are onboard.

Met rank and file still racist, Doreen Lawrence says

Doreen Lawrence said that significant progress had been made within the police since “racism and incompetence” blighted the investigation into her son’s brutal murder in April 1993.

But she said that many of the policies devised by civil servants and chief officers had not filtered down to the rank and file who policed the streets.

Mrs Lawrence spoke out after hearing Jack Straw, the Justice Secretary, and Sir Paul Stephenson, the Met Commissioner, tell a conference marking the tenth anniversary of the Stephen Lawrence inquiry that the “institutional racism” tag no longer applied to the police.

“At street level the label still applies,” Mrs Lawrence said. “It’s the officers on the beat that we need to change.”

She added that proclamations by senior officers that there was no institutional racism would reinforce bad practice and prejudice at ground level. In her opening address to the conference, Mrs Lawrence said she feared that the issue of racial equality in many walks of public life had become “watered down”.

So far so unsurprising.. apart from Boris having boarded the bandwagon… I wonder if the met are still allowed watermelon smiles… But here’s a contribution to LabourList (yeah – the same labourlist that was lobbing ‘Racism’ grendades at right wing bloggers last week) that sums up pretty well how the Met got to where they are today and why white coppers will always remain racist so long as affirmative action is taken to over-promote incompetent fuzzies.

The Black Police Officers’ Association have called on the black and Asian community not to apply to the Met. How did we get here?

Firstly you need to recognise that if there is a quota to transform one third of the workforce to ethnic, then this doesn’t mean that a white officer has only a two-thirds chance of getting a promotion; it means that he has virtually no chance until the numbers have been achieved.

So although almost every reasonable person on the planet, including you, agrees with the principle that the police force should reflect the diversity of the community, until the numbers have been achieved, your career has just been put on hold.

I bet you still agree with the principle, and I bet you didn’t join the police for the money; you joined because you wanted to make the world a better place. OK, maybe Frank and Jim joined because they were bullied in school and now they get a chance to chuck their weight around, but they’re not ambitious like you; they don’t much mind what colour the skipper is as long as he puts his hand in his pocket at the bar.

You, on the other hand, are ambitious, but you agree with the principle; it’s inevitable that the Met is changed to reflect the times and if it happened slowly over the years, would that be any better than if it happened quickly over a couple of years? You’ll still rise, cos you’ve got talent. Best to let Sir Ian Blair get on with the job and just be supportive.

By the way, you’ve got a new mate called Dixon. Eugene Dixon. He’s ten years younger than you and he’s on rapid promotion; we need to make our force reflect the community we serve. Unfortunately, you’re about to find out that the bloke’s completely clueless and the stuff he should’ve known before he was even considered for the job, you have to tell him three times. You are patient, because you understand how important it is but sometimes you can’t help but let your irritation show.

And that was where the problem came; you didn’t expect what he came out with, asking you if the hostility is due to your racism. You were really taken aback; surely you can’t be racist? You support what Mr Blair is doing. You’re not a racist; you were just irritated that the guy was promoted to Inspector before he’d even learnt how to be a Sergeant. But you’re not a racist.

No – you don’t have to be a racist to be an authoritarian jumped-up bully-boy cunt in a fluorescent coat. But it helps.

By the way – I may well be a racist by modern fucked-up standard, but I hate these two evil fucks with perfectly equal vigour:

 
Guilty: Antonette Richardson, left, and Tony Virasami were both convicted of the
manslaughter of Kevin Tripp after Richardson mistook him for someone she had
argued with while queuing for cigarettes in a Sainsbury’s supermarket

Harrowing CCTV footage emerged today of the moment an innocent shopper was killed in a supermarket in a row over queue-jumping.

Antonette Richardson was today behind bars after her boyfriend killed father-of-one Kevin Tripp in a case of mistaken identity.

Mr Tripp died after receiving a single blow to the head from Tony Virasami, while standing in a check-out queue at Sainsbury’s in Merton, south London.

Virasami was incited to carry out the attack by his girlfriend, heroin-addicted 37-year-old grandmother Richardson. Today she was convicted by a jury of manslaughter.

The full extent of the couple’s criminal life can now be revealed after she pleaded guilty to manslaughter.

Virasami – who has a string of convictions for petty theft and handling stolen goods dating back 20 years – was under a curfew and on bail for shoplifting. He was wearing an electronic tag when he launched the unprovoked attack.

Richardson has a 16-year criminal record. She has previously received community orders, conditional discharges and fines, for charges including deception, handling stolen goods and theft.

Put the fucking pair of them in a refuse incinerator.

AJ

Clarkson intransigent on idiocy of Brown

The outcome of the ‘Clarkson outburst’ incident is a thing of splendour and beauty.

Clarkson, 48, said: "I very specifically apologised for making fun of his personal appearance – very specifically.

"I have nothing against the Scottish and of course I regret making any remark that might have upset the disabled.

"But the idiot bit – there is no chance I’ll apologise for that."

Glory be. Buy the man a bottle of vintage Margaux.

Meanwhile, Matthew D’Ancona thinks that Brown will be far more upset at the way the Cunto de Tutti Cunti has rubbed Brown’s face in it this week, by way of his mutual ring-sniffing with Fuzzy Barry.

AJ

Whinging, whining spineless little gimps. Just fucking die.

Ross, Brand, Thatcher, Clarkson, Brand, Wanker, Gobshite, Muppet, Whofuckincares.

Have people seriously got nothing better to do than have round after round of pointless, petty and spiteful recriminations?

Every time I read one of these stories, I think, “There but for the grapes of gob go I.” To have one’s every uttered word scrutinised by the thought police is a ludicrous state of affairs. As Alice Fishcake says in the Times today, on the subject of ‘fallen hero’ Michael Phelps:

This need for a hero without even a toenail of clay is oppressive and unrealistic.

Political incorrectness and offence seekers are distracting from the major issues of our time. Why do people feel the need? Would they not be better stopping and taking a look at themselves? And then shutting the fuck up?

The Seppos have an name for these types, which I quite like: Milquetoasts. How we ended up with so many of the bastards in this country is a question for another time. That we have them – and aren’t permitted to torture and kill them – is enough to concern me just now.

My final word on the matter is this: If you think calling someone a Scottish idiot is racist, you’ve swallowed the PC bible sideways and it’s choking off the oxygen supply to your brain.

AJ

UPDATE: Via ‘Dissecting Leftism’, we have this:

Where Have All the Tough Guys Gone?

In an interview in the January issue of Esquire, super tough guy and Cleveland Brown of all Cleveland Browns, Jim Brown said: “A liberal is arrogant enough to think he can do you a half-***ed favor. He is superior enough to think he can give you something that you don’t deserve. A liberal will cut off your leg so he can hand you a crutch.”

…

In an interview recently on Letterman, the equally aged and, it seems, equally tough Clint Eastwood wondered aloud when we became ‘a p***y society.’

…

When did it become so ordinary, so acceptable to be a p***y? To be so helpless and inept and pathetic? And why don’t we – and our elected officials and our media – look all these embarrassing people in the face and tell them to go make their own crutches or lie by the side of the road and rot as they choose? When will we refuse to enable this ever-expanding victimhood and shameful begging and thievery?

UPDATE2: It’s a sign of the times when The Daily Mash is on the ‘reasonable, sensible and thoughtful’ side of the balance of ludicrousness on so many issues in a single week…

Guido Nails Them Good and Proper

A marvellous post on Order Order, showing the levels of the FTSE 100 over the last 30 years.

Tee-hee…

Election. Now.

AJ

Reading the barometer…

Previously I wrote:

I think of the BNP as a barometer of racial tension in the UK. As such, they do perform a useful function, which is to remind the major parties that the vast majority of the UK are white Anglo-Saxons and while we are extraordinarily relaxed about sharing our little island with fuzzy-wuzzies and the like, we don’t like having our noses rubbed in it by troughing politicians and the righteous.

Well, it seems to be little reported, but via Iain Dale, I read that there was a local council by-election in Bexley on Thursday. The voting went as follows:

East Wickham Ward By-Election – Thursday 22 January
Patricia Rose Ball (The Labour Party Candidate) – 700
Michael John Barnbrook (British National Party) – 790
Elizabeth Grace Goodlad (Liberal Democrats) – 564
Steven Frederick Hall (The Conservative Party Candidate) – 798 ELECTED
Laurence Williams (English Democrats – "Putting England First") – 128

You’ll note that the victorious Tory candidate got 8 more votes than the BNP candidate, who got 90 more than the Labour candidate.

The BNP vote, by the measure I outline above, is unsurprising. What I cannot comprehend is how these 700 utter imbeciles voted Labour. What part of ‘ruining the economy, poisoning society, trashing education’ don’t they understand?

Commentary on Conservative Home here and here. Including Wat Tyler’s golden comment:

I’d just like to congratulate Conservative candidate Steven Hall on his trouncing, nay, annihilation of the vile, odious BNP by over seven votes.

Furthermore, I would like to take this opportunity to thank everyone who made this momentous victory possible:

The millionaire Conservative donors
The LibLabCon activists/canvassers/smearers
The Hope not Hate team
The Love Music Hate Racism posse
The NUJ crew
Those cuddly Searchlight people
The impartial BBC brotherhood
The rest of the impartial media fraternity
The church of England cabal
The Holy Trinity
The Sugababes group
The chap from the Fruit & Fibre advert, his wife, and any other Z-list ‘celeb’ I may have deliberately overlooked.

You sure socked it to ‘em!

lol…

And here’s something that may have contributed….

Plans for radical new laws to boost the numbers of ethnic minority MPs have been shelved by the government because of fears of a white backlash, the Guardian has learned.

Labour ministers had been under pressure to introduce all-black shortlists to make the House of Commons more representative.

The controversial measure was being considered for inclusion in an equalities bill, due to be unveiled this year. But ministers have dropped the plans, fearing stiff opposition from white MPs and a backlash from voters.

The party’s deputy leader, Harriet Harman, and justice secretary, Jack Straw, favoured all-black shortlists, which would have seen constituency parties choosing their election candidate from a list comprised of only ethnic minority Britons.

Genius.

AJ

Round up the mongs

Harriet Hormone has had a blinder of an idea, as reported last week in The Spectator.

Over at his blog, Paul Waugh’s got the lowdown on one of the day’s most intriguing stories.  To summarise: the Government’s latest White Paper (available here) contains a proposal from Harriet Harman that all public bodies be legally obliged to narrow the gap between rich and poor.  Here it is, from page 10 of the document:

"Given the important role that public policies and services play in supporting individuals to make the most of their talents, we will consider legislating to make clear that tackling socio-economic disadvantage and narrowing gaps in outcomes for people from different backgrounds is a core function of key public services."

I suspect I’m not alone in shuddering at the thought.

I suspect you’re not – here’s Obo:

After being the cheerleader for offensively discriminatory legislation, the cunt is on the march again.

As with so many things, the devil here is in the detail. Because really, the absolute last thing any sane person needs is any more fucking government busybodying, hectoring, nannying and fucking interfering in our lives for whatever fucking reason.

But then I suspect you’re not looking at it the same way as me. If all the peasants, mongs and imbeciles are sucked up into the public sector, I’ll never have to interview another one of the useless bastards, and service will become so utterly appalling that people will finally realise that they’re being fucked every single day. And not in a good way.

Round up the whingers, scroungers, dimwits, illiterates, basket-cases and spazmos and put them in an office in Warrington where you could, without noticeable impact, launch a tactical nuclear strike to rid yourself of the problem, when you got bored of paying their un-earned wages and their ludicrous pensions.

AJ

Get back to work or fuck off home with your P45 you whinging cunt

Atheist bus adverts: Christian refuses to drive bus declaring ‘there’s probably no God’

A devout Christian has become the first driver to refuse to get behind the wheel of a bus bearing an atheist poster declaring God probably does not exist.

I suppose he’ll want one of those fish on the back of the bus next – you know – the symbol of shitty driving and complete lack of mirrors.

AJ